Comments on: Quinton “Rampage” Jackson Vs. Forrest Griffin UFC 86 Video

By: Steve-O

Steve-O — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:04:34 +0000

Fine Forrest was busier…but Rampage won that fight. Forrest did really well…but Rampage won the fight. Rampage was the agressor at times and Forrest didn’t hit anything outside the kicks. I dunno, Rampage won to me.

By: dan

dan — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:32:47 +0000

well well well, not only did wandy make whimp-page lose, griffin used tactical ability and picked that GDE non graduating thug gangbanger hero a huge loss.. I don’t care what you PC brainwashed morons say, forrest beat him and outsmarted him.. if whimp-page goes up against someone his equal or bigger he’ll come up with excuses and so will his fans…

screw off forrest won morons…

By: Jimbo

Jimbo — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:25:19 +0000

You Rampage ****** need to get a life. Griffin was clearly the superior fighter in all respects: ring management, striking, grappling. All Jackson was ever able to manage was catching Griffin with a couple of powershots as Forrest forced the action. Jackson said it best after the fight when he admitted he got his ass kicked. Bottom line is Jackson showed very little skill and was only ever able to land anything because Griffin was forcing the action. Forrest was the aggressor, had superior skills and, what really matters, won on all three score cards. It didn’t help that Jackson disrespected his opponent before the fight and then was unable to back it up.

By: santi

santi — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:57:17 +0000

anybody got this fight to
send me a havent seen
it email me at santie007@hotmail.co.uk

By: Forrest

Forrest — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:58:05 +0000

Rampage should have won!

By: Brandt

Brandt — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:00:20 +0000

One thing you have to look at is with Rampage being the champ going into the fight, he has to fight like the champ to be the judges’ favorite. There wasn’t much action, and there wasn’t much Rampage could do to Griffin. We’ve seen what he’s done in the past against great fighters, but Griffin gave him a run and even dominated him for a whole round. Rampage had that one great uppercut, and throughout the fight landed a few good shots. But even the slam wasn’t that great..he’s lucky he got out of that triangle. Griffin showed lots of heart, incredible toughness, and all around great skill standing up, in the guard, and on his back. I think he’s just slightly more deserving of it than Rampage.

When you’re the champ, you can’t have too many close 5 round fights. I thought Dan Henderson did damn good against him.

By: Me

Me — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:26:29 +0000

Hey everyone quit whining! the fights over and Forrest won! the ufc’s not gonna give rampage his title back because a bunch of spammers think he won

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:54:08 +0000

Were we watching the same fight? I think I could give Rampage maybe…maybe two rounds, and I gave Forest an 8-10 round in the second. So, I guess I’m in the minority here, but I gotta say Forest won that mutha!

By: jerry

jerry — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:57:52 +0000

forrest controled most of the fight,he pressed and did as much damage as rampage maybe more.rampage was not expected to go more then a couple rounds,forrest took him to the end.everyone needs to stop crying and take there scripts.

By: chillipeppers

chillipeppers — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:36:58 +0000

this was a good fight but forest took it in the 2nd round with the full mount and the leg kick that injured rampage. rampage did rock forrest but forrest took every round except for the first.